A couple thousand years ago Jesus declared the greatest two commandments to be "Love... God" and "Love thy Neighbor...", he then made the statement that "Upon these two commandments hang all the Law and the prophets".
That is fairly obvious. Consider the ten commandments. If you love your neighbor, then obviously you aren't going to steal from your neighbor, or kill your neighbor, or lie to your neighbor. You aren't going cheat on your loved one with your neighbor, or your neighbor's loved one.
You aren't going to covet your neighbors possessions, because that might lead to ill feelings toward your neighbor. Besides, you love your neighbor. You are going to be happy for their successes and accomplishments.
If you love God, you are going to Listen to him, and you are going to put him before material objects. Spend one day a week focusing on him, learning about him, trying to be more like him? Of Course you'd follow that small request.
So then, the Ten commandments are simply more detailed direction regarding what it means to Love God, and Love your Neighbor.
More bluntly, the ten commandments exist because some idiot couldn't figure out on his own that "Love your neighbor" included not smashing his head with a rock and taking his stuff.
It is my position that every law created is in fact contained within these two greatest commandments (Mostly, the 2nd one). Littering. If you loved God, wouldn't it sort of be obvious that you would take care of his creations? If you loved you neighbors, doesn't it make sense you would clean up after yourself, so they could have the same pristine experience you had? And so they wouldn't have to clean up your mess for you? Speeding; if you love your neighbor, are you going to drive at speeds that drastically increase the risk of you losing control of your vehicle, or failing to react to an unforeseen event, in a way that could lead to a neighbors' injury or death? No, of course not!
All our laws are efforts to more clearly define details of the two greatest commandments, because someone is too thick to figure it out on their own.
I therefore claim that there is an inverse relationship between the number of Laws, and the general IQ of a given population.
in other words... They's adding more laws 'cause they's gittin dummer!
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Dice are one of the oldest random number generators in existence.
They are not actually random.
Just think about it for a minute. When you throw a die. It leaves your hand traveling in a certain direction, and a certain speed, with a certain angular velocity.
Then, carried by momentum and influenced by gravity, it travels to the ground where it comes under the influences of elasticity (how much it “bounces”) and friction, which cause it to tumble until friction and gravity finally win out and the die comes to a complete stop.
If you knew precisely the elasticity and friction values of the die and the surface you were rolling it on, and if you had incredibly fine motor control, such that you could very precisely control the angle and speed at which the die left your hand, and the direction and speed at which it was spinning, you could roll whatever number you wanted to roll every single time.
In other words, the only reason die rolling seems random is because we are incapable of accurately measuring environmental characteristics, and precisely controlling muscles.
Computers don’t generate truly random numbers either. They use tables of numbers; they grab values off the clock… Things which appear random to us, but in reality aren’t.
There are systems which are considered "True Random Number Generators", which use radioactive decay or atmospheric events as the source for randomness. Those things certainly seem random to us, and are certainly random enough to work for our present purposes, but are they really random, or are we just failing to see the pattern? Certainly there are a number of variables involved in creating weather patterns in the earth's atmosphere, but ultimately, thunderstorms don’t just magically appear ‘at random’ . They are the result of thermal activity and moisture, which could conceivably be accurately measured, given sufficient resources.
If you are a creationist, then you believe that someone (or something) built it all and set it in motion, just like throwing a die… (only it was more like several bajillion dice all at once…)
If you subscribe to the big bang… well, there was a whole bunch of mass in a starting state, and an explosion occurred and stuff started moving based on the directions and angular momentums imparted. Still there was a starting state and an initial force, or set of forces which initiated the motion.
The only reason anything appears random to us, is due to our inability to precisely and accurately measure all the necessary values at the starting state, and precisely and accurately measure the forces which set events in motion.
Nothing is random.
There is one possible exception to this.
As a thinking, feeling being I have the ability to introduce true randomness to the system by the choices I make. Certainly some (many? most?) of my choices aren’t random, but are instead the result of parents, peers, genetics, environment...
But perhaps, occasionally, I defy the momentum those sources have imparted to me, and spin off in an entirely random direction, of my own free will and choice…